Real MBSE: The Role of SE Across the Lifecycle Webinar
Rather watch than read? Check out the recording!
2 min read
SPEC Innovations Team
:
2/5/26 3:55 PM
Don't feel like reading? Watch the recording!
Functional analysis is often considered the heart of systems engineering, a critical step that helps define exactly what a system needs to do to meet mission objectives. In the third part of our "Real MBSE" webinar series, Dr. Steven Dam demystified this process, demonstrating how modern tools like Innoslate enable efficient functional analysis and powerful simulation, transforming what can often be a painful process into a streamlined path toward mission success.
While object-oriented analysis (OOA) has its place, particularly in software development, a functional approach remains essential for systems engineering. Systems engineers must focus on mission and system-level analysis and, crucially, behavior analysis. The core question is always: "Functionally, what am I doing? And not how am I doing it necessarily, but what am I doing?"
The key takeaway is that neither OOA alone nor functional analysis alone is sufficient for comprehensive systems engineering and program management. Lifecycle Modeling Language (LML), the foundation of the techniques discussed, is a hybrid language that integrates both object-oriented and functional analysis elements. This hybrid approach enables broader representation of systems engineering and the integration of program management disciplines, an area of increasing focus for organizations such as INCOSE and PMI.
Modeling and drawing diagrams are important, but they are not enough. Dr. Dam reminds us, "all models are wrong" until they are validated and tested. This is where simulation steps in.
Simulation is crucial for:
Risk Analysis: Monte Carlo analysis is recommended to understand the range of potential outcomes and risks inherent in the system design.
Calibrated Models: The ultimate goal of digital engineering is to create a well-calibrated model, a predictive analysis tool built upon experimental data. This allows engineers to narrow the range of uncertainty and make more precise predictions.
Deriving Performance Requirements: Functional analysis provides the functional requirements (what the system does), while model simulation helps derive the performance requirements (how well the system must perform).
Dr. Dam outlined a robust, multi-step process for functional analysis that transforms abstract user needs into concrete, verifiable system requirements:
This process is highly effective both for systems being built from scratch and for analyzing existing, incomplete, or "sterile" sets of requirements handed down from other groups.
A vital artifact in this process is the Concept of Operations (CONOPS). More than just an operational concept diagram, the CONOPS is the primary tool for visualizing and articulating stakeholder expectations and requirements.
Scenarios are the heart of the CONOPS. By simulating these scenarios, engineers can quickly identify potential failures or timing conflicts in the proposed operational processes.
Functional analysis, when applied correctly with simulation, is the engine that drives robust, predictable, and successful system development. By adopting hybrid modeling approaches and leveraging tools that enforce behavioral consistency, systems engineers can eliminate the "pain" and deliver designs that truly meet the mission need.
Have questions about model-based systems engineering or requirements management? Talk to an expert and see how Innoslate can streamline your projects from start to finish.
Rather watch than read? Check out the recording!
Don't feel like reading? Watch the recording!
Not in the mood to read? Watch the webinar recording!